Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-21

SANSAR GRAMODYOG MANDAL INDUSTWRIAL AREA, BIWANI, HARYANA vs ARORA GRAM YDYOG VIKAS MANDAL, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BHIWANI, HARYANA

Citation / case number
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-509/2022 2025:DHC:2036
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANSAR GRAMODYOG MANDAL INDUSTWRIAL AREA, BIWANI, HARYANA
Respondent
ARORA GRAM YDYOG VIKAS MANDAL, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BHIWANI, HARYANA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21st March, 2025 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 509/2022 SANSAR GRAMODYOG MANDAL INDUSTRIAL AREA, BIWANI, HARYANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivendra Pratap Singh, Mr. Navdeep Suhag and Ms. Mehak Khanna, Advocates versus ARORA GRAM YDYOG VIKAS MANDAL, INDUSTRIAL AREA, BHIWANI, HARYANA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shambhavi Sharma, Advocate CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present rectification petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking removal of the mark “TAJ” bearing registration no.432174 in Class 3. 2. The present rectification petition was filed before the erstwhile Intellectual Property Appellate Board (‘IPAB’) on 29th October 2012. Thereafter, the present petition was received on transfer after the abolition of the IPAB pursuant to the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021. 3. A counter statement dated 12th June 2013 had been filed on behalf of the respondent organisation, and a rejoinder thereto dated 30th October 2013 had been filed on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Counsel for the petitioner relies upon the Assignment Deed executed by the respondent organisation in favour of the petitioner on