Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-06

SANJAY SUSHIL BHOSALE vs YOGESH GUPTA

Citation / case number
FAO-52/2025 2025:DHC:1565
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SANJAY SUSHIL BHOSALE
Respondent
YOGESH GUPTA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 6th March, 2025 FAO 52/2025 & CM APPL. 13619/2025 SANJAY SUSHIL BHOSALE .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Pipaniya, Ms. Pallavi Pipaniya, Mr. Gopesh Jindal, Mr. Paras Punyani, Ms. Nikita Garg, Mr. H.P.S. Anand, Mr. Lavish Chhikara, Mr. Deepak Mathur, Ms. Diksha Dharia and Mr. Aayush Rathor, Advs. versus YOGESH GUPTA ....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 13620/2025 – EXMP. 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. FAO 52/2025 & CM APPL. 13619/2025 3. The appellant/defendant has preferred the present appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 (d) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”] assailing impugned order dated 25.01.2025 passed by the learned District Judge-03, Rohini Court, North District, Delhi [“trial Court”] whereby his application under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC for setting aside the ex-parte judgment and decree dated 4. No one appeared for the respondent/plaintiff despite sending advance notice. 5. In a nutshell, the present suit was instituted by the respondent/ plaintiff in which