SANDEEP GUPTA vs UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 3224/2025 & CM APPL. 15034/2025, CM APPL. 15035/2025 SANDEEP GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person versus UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manish Kumar Singh and Mr. Vasu Agarwal for Mr. Ravinder Agarwal, Advocates for R1 Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 12.03.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Though this petition, as it has been drafted and filed by the petitioner, who appears in person, has several defects, the essential grievance of the petitioner appears to be that the petitioner’s prayer for interim relief has not been considered by the Central Administrative Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT W.P.(C) 3224/2025 Page 1 of 3 KUMAR Signing Date:12.03.2025 19:43:29 Tribunal1. 2. We see from the record that the Tribunal has, by order dated 9 January 2025, granted time to the respondents to file reply. 3. It appears that, till date, there is no decision by the Tribunal, even ad interim, on the prayer for interim relief as contained in para 8 of the OA filed by the petitioner. 4. We, accordingly, dispose of this petition with a direction to the Tribunal to take a decision, ad interim or final, on the prayer for interim relief contained in para 8 of the OA filed by the petitioner, on 17 March 2025, on which date the matter is next listed before the Tribunal. 5. The Tribunal is requested to take a decision on the petitioner’s prayer for interim relief on the said date. 6. We request Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Advocate (Mobile No.9999941193) who appears before us reg