Delhi High Court · 2025-03-18
SACHHI SHURUAAT SEWA SMITI (NGO) vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-7542/2017 2025:DHC:1707
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- SACHHI SHURUAAT SEWA SMITI (NGO)
- Respondent
- DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Judgment text excerpt
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on : 28 February 2025 Judgment pronounced on : 18 March 2025 + W.P. (C) NO. 7542/2017 & CM APPL. 2063/2020, CM. APPL 8897/2022 SACCHI SHURUAAT SEWA SAMITI (NGO) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Prabhsahay Kaur, Standing Counsel with Ms. Deekhsa L Kakar, Mr. Bir Inder Singh and Mr. Rashneet Singh, Advs. with Ms. Kamleshwari Pandi, Naib Tehisaldar (DDA) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner herein invokes the extra-ordinary jurisdiction of this Court by instituting the present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, by seeking the following reliefs against the respondent/Delhi Development Authority [‘DDA’]: - a) An appropriate writ may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent thereby directing the respondent to accept the lease money from the allottees of the land in respect of agricultural land situated in Khasra No.16,24 North Chiraga Somali, Khattewala Rakba, Marginal Band, now known as Shastri Park, Delhi. b) An appropriate writ may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent thereby directing the respondent to allow the said allottees of the land to raise a boundary wall for the protection and security of their land and standing crops Signature Not Verified W.P. (C) NO. 7542/2017 Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD Page 1 of 20 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:18.03.2025 16:50:02 from roaming cattle, wild animals, and the security of standing from the social miscreants. c) Pass such other, further order(s) in the facts and circumstances of the case as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and equitable in favour of the petitioner. BR