RAMESH HANAMANT SAVALATOT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

KVM 1/5 902 - ABA 739 OF 2025.doc 2023. 2. The present applicant is accused no.5. There are total seven accused. Five accused have been arrested and are behind bars. One more accused is absconding. The pre-arrest bail application filed by the present applicant before the Sessions Judge at Barshi has been KVM 2/5 902 - ABA 739 OF 2025.doc rejected by an order dated 14 th February, 2025. Hence, the present pre-arrest bail application has been filed. 3. In the complaint attached to the FIR, there are specific allegations made against the present applicant that he has participated in the act of counterfeiting the currency. An amount of Rs.65 lacs has already been seized by the police. It has been alleged that the machine used for printing the counterfeit currency is owned by the present applicant. On the basis of which, an FIR has been alleged. 4. On behalf of the applicant, it is submitted that the applicant has no role to play in the present crime and has been implicated only on the basis of suspicious. The investigation is completed. Therefore, the custodial interrogation of the present applicant is not necessary. 5. The learned A.P.P. submits that the co-accused has revealed the na