Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-04

RAKESH KUMAR BANSAL vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-11810/2024 2025:DHC:1454
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAKESH KUMAR BANSAL
Respondent
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~102 & 103 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 4th March, 2025 W.P.(C) 11810/2024 & CM APPL. 49128/2024 & CM APPL. 49130/2024 & CM APPL. 62984/2024 RAKESH KUMAR BANSAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Divita Vyas and Ms. Rea Bhalla, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu along with Mr. Utkarsh Singh along with Mr. Chinmaya Chakvarti, Deputy Director and Mr. Devendra Dadwal, Assistant Director. 103 W.P.(C) 12982/2024 & CM APPL. 54105/2024 NIHAL SINGH MEENA & ANR. ....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sonia A. Menon, Advocate. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu along with Mr. Utkarsh Singh along with Mr. Chinmaya Chakvarti, Deputy Director and Mr. Devendra Dadwal, Assistant Director. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Mr. Sannu, learned counsel for DDA, submits that the petitioners herein have cited medical reasons for not depositing the due amount as per the prescribed Schedule. 2. He submits that as per instructions and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of DDA, they are ready to process the request of both the petitioners for allotm