RAJESH BREJA vs THE STATE

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 25th February, 2025 Pronounced on: 6th March, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4849/2024 RAJESH BREJA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Rebecca M. John, Senior Advocate with Mr.Anshul Mittal, Mr. Parvir Singh & Ms. Khushi Aggarwal, Advocates Versus THE STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent-State with SI Rahul Kumar Mr. Siddharth Aggarwal, Mr.Samar Kachwaha, Mr.Rahul Kriplani, Ms.Rea Bhalla & Ms.Masooma Rizvi, Advocates for Complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟ hereinafter) read with Sections 483/528 of The Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 („BNSS‟ hereinafter) has been filed for grant of regular Bail to the Applicant-Rajesh Breja, in case FIR BAIL APPLN. 4849/2024 Signature Not Verified Page 1 of 13 Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:06.03.2025 18:03:31 No.0646/2023, under Sections 120B/115 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟ hereinafter), registered at Police Station Paschim Vihar East, New Delhi. The Applicant is in custody since 15.11.2024 and his Bail Application has been dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge vide Order dated 23.12.2024. 2. It is submitted that present FIR No. 646/2023, under Section 120 B IPC was registered on 24.08.2023, on the Complaint of one Sunil Mohan Bajaj and his two sons, Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj and Aditya Mohan Bajaj, on the allegation that on 20.08.2023, one boy Nikhil(co-accused), met Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, and told him that Applicant-Rajesh Breja had given a sum of Rs.3-4 lacs to co-accused Mohit to kill him and his family members and he along with other associate