Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-25

RAJ KUMAR vs DARSHAN CHAWLA

Citation / case number
RSA-39/2018 2025:DHC:2242
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAJ KUMAR
Respondent
DARSHAN CHAWLA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RSA 39/2018, CM APPL. 8027/2018, CM APPL. 8028/2018 RAJ KUMAR .....Appellant Through: Ms. Monica Kapoor, Ms. Bhavya Singh, Advs. with appellant. versus DARSHAN CHAWLA .....Respondent Through: Mr. C.L. Dhawan, Ms. Aanchal Bansal, Advs. Date of Decision: 25.03.2025. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of CPC challenging the order and judgment dated 25.10.2017 passed by learned Additional District Judge-02, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Regular Civil Appeal No. 5/17 titled Sh. Raj Kumar vs. Sh. Darshan Chawla, vide which judgment dated 26.07.2016 passed by learned JSCC-Cum-ASCJ- Cum- GDN Judge, North, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit No. 534433/16 titled Darshan Chawla vs. Raj Kumar was upheld. RSA 39/2018 2. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that the respondent (hereinafter referred to as „Plaintiff‟) filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 2,66,220/- along with pendent lite and future interest. It has been alleged in the plaint that the appellant (hereinafter referred to as „Defendant‟) had approached the Plaintiff f