Delhi High Court · 2025-03-17
RAHUL VERMA SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAI SHREE NATHJI LOGISTICS (INDIA) vs CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.
- Citation / case number
- ARB.P.-1443/2024 2025:DHC:2273
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- RAHUL VERMA SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAI SHREE NATHJI LOGISTICS (INDIA)
- Respondent
- CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 17.03.2025 ARB.P. 1443/2024 RAHUL VERMA SOLE PROPRIETOR OF M/S JAI SHREE NATHJI LOGISTICS (INDIA) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hari Kishan, Adv. versus CONTAINER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. SC Rajpal, Mr. Varun Rajpal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH : JASMEET SINGH, J (ORAL) 1. This is a petition filed under section 11(5) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties arising out of the Contract Agreement bearing No. CON/DD/2012/B.A/32 dated 14.05.2012 (“agreement”). 2. The arbitration clause is contained as clause 6.12 of the said agreement and the same reads as under: “6.12 ARBITRATION: 6.12.1 Any dispute between the Business Associate and CONCOR will be resolved amicably by mutual consultations or through the good offices of the Director Domestic/CONCOR. 6.12.2 The services under this agreement shall be continued during the Conciliation/arbitration proceedings, unless it is proved that the services cannot possibly be continued during the arbitration proceedings” 3. The facts are that the pe