PUMA SE vs MAHESH KUMAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 725/2022, I.A. 17018/2022, I.A. 17019/2022 & I.A. 48178/2024 PUMA SE .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ranjan Narula, Mr. Shakti Priyan Nair and Mr. Parth Bajaj, Advocates versus MAHESH KUMAR .....Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 12.02.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL) IA/48178/2024 (Application on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XIII- A read with Order VIII Rule 10 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) 1. The present application is filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XIIIA, read with Order VIII Rule 10, and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”). 2. Present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction inter alia, restraining infringement of their trademarks, „PUMA‟, logo and Form strip logo by the defendant and for 3. The plaintiff seeks a summary judgement against the defendant, on the ground that the defendant has no prospect of the defending the claims of the plaintiff. 4. The case, as canvassed by the plaintiff, is as follows: 4.1 The plaintiff company is one of the world‟s largest sports brands engaged in designing, develo