Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-28

POONAM BISHT vs SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS.

Citation / case number
CONT.CAS(C)-1741/2023 2025:DHC:2118-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
POONAM BISHT
Respondent
SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 28.03.2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 1741/2023 POONAM BISHT .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Shambhavi, Adv. along with petitioner in person. versus SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shreya Singhal, Ms. M. Keditsu, and Ms. Kushagra Singla, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner complaining of violation of the terms and conditions for physical visitation as stipulated in the Order dated 07.10.2023 passed by the learned Family Court-02, South-East, Saket, in G.P. No. 18/20 titled Samrat Singh Rawat v. Poonam Rawat, wherein it was specifically directed that the respondent herein, who is petitioner in the said proceedings, shall not be accompanied by his parents or his other family members or any other persons or take photographs or make videography of his meeting with the children. It is the case of petitioner that there was a breach of these conditions of visitation in the visitation ordered by this Court vide its Order dated 09.11.2023. 2. This Court, vide its aforesaid Order, had directed that the respondent shall be entitled to a visitation, along with his parents, with the children at the office of the petitioner on the occasion of Diwali on 12.11.2023. Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIJAYA CONT.CAS(C) 1741/2023 Page 1 of 3 LAKSHMI DOBHAL Signing Date:02.04.2025 16:20:58 3. It is the case of the petitioner herein that as the said office space was not available due to the employer having Pooja in the office, the petitioner arranged for a private conference room ‘in her other office’ which was located in the same area and was a co-working space. Accordingly, she sent an e-mail dated 10

POONAM BISHT vs SAMRAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS. · Niyam