Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-26

PAWAN KUMAR RASTOGI & ANR. vs MANJU RASTOGI THROUGH GPA

Citation / case number
CM(M)-561/2025 2025:DHC:2046
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PAWAN KUMAR RASTOGI & ANR.
Respondent
MANJU RASTOGI THROUGH GPA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 26th March, 2025 CM(M) 561/2025 & CM APPL. 17506-17508/2025 PAWAN KUMAR RASTOGI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mayank Rustagi, Advocate. versus MANJU RASTOGI THROUGH GPA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners are defending a suit for mandatory injunction. 2. During course of the proceedings, they filed an application seeking amendment in written statement. Such application was taken up by learned Trial Court on 13.02.2025 and certain clarifications were also provided to learned Trial Court by learned counsel for both the sides. 3. Such application is yet to be disposed of by learned Trial Court and the matter is now fixed for tomorrow for further consideration on such application. 4. The grievance raised by petitioners/defendants is limited to the effect that out of nowhere, the plaintiff sought time to place on record certified copy of sale deed of a property as well as certain Notifications. 5. Learned counsel for petitioners submits that these documents are not relevant for the purpose of disposal of his application moved under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.