Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-03-18

PANDURANG RAJARAM INAMDAR vs ACCELYA SOLUTION INDIA LTD.

Citation / case number
WP/1931/2024
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
PANDURANG RAJARAM INAMDAR
Respondent
ACCELYA SOLUTION INDIA LTD.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

-WP1931-2024.DOC Santosh IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1931 OF 2024 Pandurang Rajaram Inamdar ...Petitioner Versus Accelya Solution India Private Ltd. (formerly Kale Consultants Limited) A Public Limited Company …Respondent Mr. Laxman Deshmukh, for the Petitioner. Mr. Abhijit Adgule, for the Respondent. CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. RESERVED ON: 9th JANUARY, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 18th MARCH, 2025 JUDGMENT:- 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally. 2. The petitioner – plaintiff takes exception to an order dated 24th November, 2023 passed by the learned District Judge, Kolhapur, whereby the application (Exhibit-23) preferred by the SANTOSH petitioner to abandon a part of the prayer in RCS/1496/2012 SUBHASH KULKARNI 3. Shorn of unnecessary details, the background facts leading to this petition can be stated as under: 3.1 The respondent – defendant is a Public Limited Company. The defendant is a leading IT solutions provider to various 1/19 -WP1931-2024.DOC industries. The petitioner was working as a Senior Vice President – Banking with the defendant company. I

PANDURANG RAJARAM INAMDAR vs ACCELYA SOLUTION INDIA LTD. · Niyam