Delhi High Court · 2025-03-18
NKG INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED vs UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMODATION PROJECT & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- ARB.P.-320/2025 2025:DHC:1809
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- NKG INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED
- Respondent
- UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMODATION PROJECT & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18th MARCH, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: + ARB.P. 320/2025 NKG INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Risha Mittal, Mr. Rohan Narula, Mr. Sanchit Gupta and Md. Adil Alam, Advocates. versus UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DIRECTOR GENERAL, MARRIED ACCOMODATION PROJECT & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr Subhrodeep Saha and Mr Prabhat Kumar, Advs. Ms. Archana Kumari, GP CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. The Petitioner has approached this Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes which have arisen between the Petitioner and the Respondents under Contract Agreement dated 26.08.2010. 2. Material on record discloses that Respondent No.1 issued a tender for Construction of Dwelling Units Including Allied Services for Officers, Sr. Sailors (MCPO)/Jr. Sailors at Naval Site Goa (Vasco). It is stated that the Petitioner herein submitted its bid for the said tender and the same was Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB.P. 320/2025 Page 1 of 6 By:RAHUL SINGH Signing Date:20.03.2025 19:20:38 accepted for a lump sum amount of Rs.1,15,38,41,717/- and Contract Agreement dated 26.08.2010 was entered into between the Petitioner and the Respondents. It is stated that under the said Contract, the Respondent No.1 herein issued a Work Order to the Petitioner on 06.09.2010 which was to be completed within 25 months, i.e. on or before 05.10.2012. It is stated that the work was delayed and the Petitioner herein sought extension of time from the Respondents for completion of the work. Material on record further discloses that the Respondent No.1 certified that the work order