NITIN VASHISHT vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 10th March, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 4267/2023 NITIN VASHISHT .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manvendra Mukul, Mr. Anupam Vasishth, Mr. Sundeep Sirohi, Mr. Jayendra Pandey and Ms. Akansha Vasishth, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for the State SI Gaurav, PS EOW Mr. Chander Mohan, Mr. Akashdeep Pandey and Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocates for the Complainant % CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL): 1. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking grant of anticipatory bail in FIR bearing no. 503/2023 registered under Sections 419/420/467/471 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at Police Station (P.S.) Farash Bazar, Delhi. Brief facts relevant to the case 2. In brief, the case of the prosecution as borne out from the status reports is that the aforesaid FIR was registered on the complaint of Ms. Signature Not Verified Signed By:MAHIMA SHARMA BAIL APPLN. 4267/2023 Page 1 of 13 Signing Date:14.03.2025 17:07:17 Sameeksha Sharma against her nephew Nitin Vashisht [Applicant herein] and his mother Smt. Kusum Lata, who is the sister of the complainant. 2.1 It is stated that the complainant in the year 2014 after a matrimonial dispute with her husband moved to Delhi (from Rewari) and was searching for a job. It is stated that the complainant’s sister Kusum Lata and her nephew Nitin Vashisht [Applicant] supported her in Delhi and offered a lucrative business deal of trading with an initial investment of Rs. 10,000/. It is stated that the complainant was not interested in the business, however, on the request of both the alleged persons, she gave them the