Bombay High Court · 2025-03-07
NATIONAL AGR.CO-OP.MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDI.LTD.(NAFED)THR.AUT.SIG.VIKAS RAWAL, ASS.MANAGER vs ROJ ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
- Citation / case number
- COARA/15/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- NATIONAL AGR.CO-OP.MARKETING FEDERATION OF INDI.LTD.(NAFED)THR.AUT.SIG.VIKAS RAWAL, ASS.MANAGER
- Respondent
- ROJ ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD. AND ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPEAL NO.15 OF 2024 National Agricultural Co-operative } Marketing Federation of India } Limited (NAFED), A cooperative Society, } having its registered office at NAFED } House, Siddhartha Enclave, Ashram } Chowk, New Delhi-110014 and having } its branch office at Naman Centre, } A Wing, Unit No.803, G Block, C-31, } Opp. Dena Bank, One BKC } Mumbai-400 051 } Through its authorized signatory } Mr. Vikas Rawal, Asst. Manager (Legal) } .. Appellant Verus 1. Roj Enterprises (P) Limited } Having its office at A-8, Saket, } 45/1+2/A, Karwe Nagar, Off. } Patwardhan Building, Pune } 2. Mr. Suresh G. Motwani, } having his office at 39, Mysore } Colony, Anik Village, Behind RCF, } Chember, Mumbai. } 3. Mr. Rajendra Narhar Kulkarni, } having his office at Row House No.8, } Swapnashilpa, 19/2C, Ganesh Nagar, } Kothrud, Pune-411029. } .. Respondents ... Dr. Veerendra Tulzapurkar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Joglekar, Senior Advocate, Mr. Ankit Tiwari, Mr. Sagar Chaurasiya i/by Shashipal Shankar, Advocates for the appellant. Mr. Ashish Kamat, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho, Mr. Rishab Murali, Ms. Punita Arora, Mr. Puneet Arora i/by M/s. Arora & Co., Advocates for the respondent nos.1 and 3. ... 1/25 COARA-15-2024 judgement.doc Rameshwar Dilwale CORAM : A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH PATIL, JJ Date on which the arguments concluded : 18th DECEMBER 2024 Date on which the judgment is pronounced : 7th MARCH 2025. JUDGEMENT : (PER : A. S. CHANDURKAR, J.) 1. This Commercial Arbitration Appeal filed under Section 37(1) (c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short, ‘Act of 1996’) raises a challenge to the judgment dated 22/04/2024 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Pu