NARENDER KUMAR vs SMT. SAROJ GARG

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 07.03.2025 RC.REV. 58/2025 & CM Appl.10377/2025 NARENDER KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. P.K. Rawal, Mr. Tarun Agarwal and Mr. Akhil Singh, Advs. with Petitioner in person. versus SMT. SAROJ GARG .....Respondent Through: Mr. Absar Ahmad, Adv. with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.:(Oral) 1. The Petitioner and Respondent are physically present in the Court today. 2. After some arguments, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 31.12.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 31.12.2025, subject to the Petitioner paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that this is acceptable to 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a period of one week undertaking that: (i