N vs STATE & ANR.

$~20 & 21 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 CRL.REV.P. 601/2022 & CRL.M.A. 18561/2022 N .....Petitioner Through: Mr Zeeshan Diwan, DHCLSC and Mr. Harsha, Advocates. versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr Naresh Chahar APP for State with SI Pankaj Kumar PS Jyoti Nagar Mr. R.N. Dubey and Mr. Tarun Garg, Advs. for R-2. Mr. Deepak Prakash, Advocate/ Amicus Curiae. (21) CRL.REV.P. 873/2023 & CRL.M.A. 22590/2023 THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) .....Petitioner Through: Mr Naresh Chahar APP for State with SI Pankaj Kumar PS Jyoti Nagar. versus PREMPAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. R.N. Dubey and Mr. Tarun Garg, Advocates Mr. Deepak Prakash, Advocate/Amicus Curiae. 1. By way of these petitions, the prosecutrix „N‟ as well as the State seek setting aside of the order 30.11.2021 [hereafter „the impugned order‟] passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, (Special Fast Track Court), East, North East & Shahdara District, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Sessions Court‟]. 2. By way of the impugned order, the learned Sessions Court has discharged the accused/respondent for the commission of offence under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860