Delhi High Court · 2025-03-25
MS HOTLINE FASHION INDIA PVT LTD vs MS SENTINEL CONSULTANTS PVT LTD ORS & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- EX.F.A.-43/2023 2025:DHC:2015
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- MS HOTLINE FASHION INDIA PVT LTD
- Respondent
- MS SENTINEL CONSULTANTS PVT LTD ORS & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
$- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV + EX.F.A. 43/2023 and CM APPL. 53531/2023, CMAPPL.62252/2023, CM APPL. 4739/2024, CM APPL. 4933/2024 M/S HOTLINE FASHION INDIA PVT. LTD. REGD. OFFICE: 106, GULAB BUILDING, 237, PD'MELLO ROAD, FORTH, MUMBAI-400001. ....APPELLANT (Through: Mr.Kanwal Chaudhary, Mr. B.K. Singh, Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Singh, Mr. Sudip and Mr. AnkitKumar, Advocates., Advocates.) Versus 1. M/S SENTINEL CONSULTANTS PVT. LTD. &ORS. REGD. OFFICE AT: 1006, SECTOR 7-C FARIDABAD – 121006 2. SHRI SUDHIR MALHOTRA S/O LATE SHRI CHAMN LAL MALHOTRA R/O 10, CIVIL LINES, MORADABAD (U.P.) 3. M/S BUILDMORE INDIA LTD. REGD. OFFICE AT: 8/25, WEST PATEL NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110008 ....RESPONDENTS (Through: Mr. Y. K. Kapur, Advocate for R-1.) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % Reserved on: 28.01.2025 Pronounced on: 25.03.2025 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRIYA Digitally Signed Signing Date:26.03.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 18:38:32 1 KUMAR KAURAV JUDGMENT The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant-objector against the order dated 08.07.2023, passed by the Learned Additional District Judge, South East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi, in Execution Petition No. 127/2017, whereby, an application under Order XXI Rule 97 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, has been dismissed. 2. The case of the appellant-objector is that, the impugned judgment and decree, as well as the corresponding sale deed executed in favor of the respondent no.1-decree holder, are illegal, null, and void ab initio to the extent they pertain to the “rear basement” of