MOHD NAIM AHMED vs MOHD IMRAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.03.2025 RC.REV. 680/2015 MOHD NAIM AHMED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. ___, Advocate (appearance not given) with Petitioner No.1(i) and 1(iii) in person. versus MOHD IMRAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Dhalla and Mr. Sohan Singh Rawat, Advocates with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. Petitioner Nos.1(i) and 1(iii) are physically present in Court today. The Respondent is also physically present in Court. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioners, submits that the Petitioners needs additional time upto 30.09.2025 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondent, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 30.09.2025, subject to the Petitioners paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 8,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submit that this is acceptable to 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioners, within a pe