M/S JAIN DOMESTIC APPLIANCES vs M/S SUNRISE INDUSTRIES

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21th March, 2025 CM(M) 314/2025 & CM APPL. 8967/2025 M/S JAIN DOMESTIC APPLIANCES .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohit Dutta and Ms. Priyata Chakraborty, Advocates. versus M/S SUNRISE INDUSTRIES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Gupta and Ms. Deepti Gupta, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. After hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the respondent/ plaintiff submits that, without prejudice to his rights and contentions, he would have no objection if the present petition is allowed and the petitioner herein i.e. defendant is permitted to place on record the documents mentioned in his application moved under Order XI Rule 1 (7) (c) CPC. 2. The details of such documents are also referred in paragraph 4 of the impugned order. 3. The case is, reportedly, at the stage of defendant’s evidence. 4. In view of the above gracious concession given by Mr. Rahul Gupta, learned counsel for the respondent/ plaintiff, the present petition is allowed by permitting the defendant to place on record following documents:- 5. Since the affidavit of examination-in-chief of the concerned defenda