M/S CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED vs PRABHSIMRAN SINGH PROPRIETOR OF M/S THE PRESTIGE MOTORS & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~O-6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 1980/2024 Date of Decision: 27.03.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: M/S CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anurag Arora, Adv. versus PRABHSIMRAN SINGH PROPRIETOR OF M/S THE PRESTIGE MOTORS & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) 1. An affidavit of service dated 11.03.2025 has been filed, which reads as under: “2. That I state that the deponent has served the copy of the notice along with the copy of the petition upon the Respondent no.2 through speed post on her last known and available addresses and the same are deemed to be served. The proof of service by post has been annexed herewith. 3. That I state that the deponent has served the copy of the notice along with the copy of the petition upon the Respondent No.2 at her Whatsapp +91 9999223906. The proof of service has already been annexed herewith. 4. That the Respondent No. 2 is deemed to be served on her last known and available address as per record. That the Aadhar card of the Respondent no.2 is annexed herewith. She is the wife of the Respondent no.1. 5. That I state that the Respondent No.2 has been duly served.” Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRIYA Digitally Signed Signing Date:29.03.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 16:45:50 KUMAR KAURAV 2. The office report also indicates that the service through mail was effected on the respondent no. 1, even the track report placed on record by the petitioner would indicate that the service through speed-post was also effected on the respondents. 3. Despite the aforesaid, no one appears for the respondents. The service deems to have been completed. 4. The petitioner is a non-banki