LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER vs RAJ BELTS & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 502/2017, I.A. 8962/2023, I.A. 13438/2023 & I.A. 23398/2023 LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Sampurnaa Sanyal and Mr. Dhananjay Khanna, Advocates Mob: 9837461666 Email: [email protected] versus RAJ BELTS & ORS. .....Defendants Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 10.03.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL) I.A. 8962/2023 (Application under Order VIII Rules 1 and 10 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 for pronouncement of judgment). 1. The instant application has been filed under Order VIII Rules 1 and 10 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), for pronouncement of judgment. 2. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of plaintiff’s registered trademarks, i.e., Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CS(COMM) 502/2017 Page 1 of 11 By:AMAN UNIYAL Signing Date:27.03.2025 11:47:13 “LOUIS VUITTON” (wordmark), the “LV” logo i.e., , “the Toile monogram pattern”, i.e., , “the Damier pattern”, “the LV Flower patterns” and other subsisting trademarks registered in Classes 3, 14, 18 and 25, passing off, unfair competition, rendition of accounts of profits, delivery up, etc. 3. This Court notes that initially the present application had been filed against defendant nos. 7 to 10. However, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff submits that the matter already stands settled with defendant nos. 9 and 10. Thus, the present application is being pressed only against defendant nos. 7 and 8. 4. Thus, this Court has proceeded to hear the present application with respect to defendant nos. 7 and 8. 5. The case of the plaintiff, as canvassed in the plaint, is as follow