LAXMI DHAR vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Judgment text excerpt

$~33 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 3rd March, 2025 + W.P.(C) 2641/2025 & CM APPL. 12555/2025 LAXMI DHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Singh and Ms. Urvashi Jain, Advocates. versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shahana Farah and Ms. Sanna H., Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Mr. G.L. Dhar (since deceased) had applied for MIG plot under RRS Scheme 1981, way back in the year 1981. 2. He was, eventually, allotted a plot in the year 2004 in Sector 29, Rohini, Delhi. 3. He also received a communication in this regard from DDA and submitted all the documents. 4. It is submitted that the entire payment with respect to the abovesaid plot was also made and the possession was also given to the Mr. G.L. Dhar. 5. However, thereafter, he was issued a show cause notice as to why the allotment may not be cancelled. 6. Mr. G.L. Dhar expired on 05.06.2018 and, thereafter, his widow i.e. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 2641/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:04.03.2025 19:04:47 petitioner herein applied for mutation of the abovesaid property in her name but despite repeated requests and visits, the mutation has yet not been done. 7. Learned counsel for respondent/DDA appears on advance notice and submits that even as per the bare perusal of the averments made in the petition, a show cause notice had been issued to the petitioner apprising as to why the allotment in question may not be cancelled as the husband of the petitioner had purchased one another DDA flat and thereby, he had violated the terms and conditions of the allotment. 8. Learned counsel for petitioner, whereas, submits that there is no such violation and that such acquisition has no bearing, being su