KUNDAN KUMAR @ GORE vs CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION

Judgment text excerpt

$~115 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Delivered on: 06.03.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1497/2024 KUNDAN KUMAR @ GORE ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshat Sharma, Mr. Siddharth Arora, Ms. Shalini Singh, Mr. Himanshu Bhandari and Mr. Prajanya Rathore, Advs. versus CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ripudaman Bhardwaj, SPP with Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj, Mr. Amit Kumar Rana and Mr. Himanshu Kaushik, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J. 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 438 read with Section 482 CrPC seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. RC 221/2023/E0005 under Section 120B read with Section 420 IPC and Sections 66C/66D of IT Act, 2000 registered at Police Station EO-III Delhi, CBI, New Delhi. Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 1497/2024 Page 1 of 12 Digitally Signed By:NARENDRA SINGH ASWAL Signing Date:06.03.2025 22:53:06 2. The case of the prosecution is that the instant RC was registered by the CBI on the basis of a written complaint received from Constable Sh. Kuldeep Kumar Hemrom posted at CBI Head Office at New Delhi. It has been alleged therein that the complainant had booked a courier from DSK Xpress Service, New Delhi, for Lucknow. Upon checking the courier's status, the complainant discovered that the same was being reflected as mis- located and the complainant attempted to look up the customer care number of Blue Dart on the internet. 3. On 05.02.2023, upon searching the internet, the complainant saw a mobile number which was shown as the customer care number of Blue Dart. Upon contacting the same he spoke to someone who identified himself as a representative of Blue Dart. Subsequently, this representative then told the complainant that he wou