Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-03-26

KAVIRAJ YUVARAJ SONTAKKE vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Citation / case number
WP/275/2025
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
KAVIRAJ YUVARAJ SONTAKKE
Respondent
THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

Megha 7_wp_275_2024_fc_corrected.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.275 OF 2024 Laxman Narayan Zagade and Ors. ...Petitioners V/s. Competent Authority and District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Pune and Ors. ...Respondents ______________ Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh with Mr. Aniket Kanawade, Mr. Vaibhav Thorave, Mr. Irvin D’souza and Ms. Karishma Shinde for the Petitioners. Mr. P.S. Dani, Senior Advocate a/w Mr. Prabhakar Jadhav, Ms. Suchita Chavan for Respondent No.2. Ms. Suchita Chavan for Respondent No.2. Mr. Tejas Deshmukh for Respondent No.3. Mr. Hamid Mulla, AGP for Respondent-State. Mr. Gauratna Kale i/b. Mr. Sachin Dhakephalkar for Respondent No.4. ______________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. Dated: 26 March 2025. Oral Judgment: MEGHA SHREEDHAR PARAB Digitally signed by MEGHA SHREEDHAR 1) Petition challenges order dated 24 November 2023 PARAB Date: 2025.04.02 14:30:52 +0530 passed by the Competent Authority and District Deputy Page No. 1 of 14 26 March 2025 Megha 7_wp_275_2024_fc_corrected.docx Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Pune City, Pune granting certificate of Unilateral Deemed Conveyance of land admeasuring 4913.17 sq.mts. together with construction admeasuring 3239.06 sq.mtrs. out of total land of 6500 sq.mts in favour of Respondent No.2-society. 2) I have heard Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh, the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners, Mr. Dani, the learned senior advocate appearing for Respondent No.2 Society, Mr. Mulla, the learned AGP for Respondent -State, Mr. Tejas Deshmukh, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.3 and Mr. Kale, the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.4. 3) The main contention raised by Mr. Sugandh Deshmukh is that the construction has been caused by Respond

KAVIRAJ YUVARAJ SONTAKKE vs THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS · Niyam