Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-11

JOHNSON & JOHNSON vs PRITAMDAS ARORA T/A M/S MEDSERVE & ANR

Citation / case number
CS(COMM)-570/2019 2025:DHC:1585
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Respondent
PRITAMDAS ARORA T/A M/S MEDSERVE & ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: 07.02.2025 Judgment pronounced on: 11.03.2025 CS(COMM) 570/2019 with I.A. 3678/2021, I.A. 3700/2021 and I.A. 12068/2022 JOHNSON & JOHNSON .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. Nancy Roy, Mr. Raghav Malik, Ms. Prakirti Varshney and Mr. Prashant, Advocates. versus PRITAMDAS ARORA T/A M/S MEDSERVE & ANR .....Defendants Through: None. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL JUDGMENT AMIT BANSAL, J. 1. The present suit has been filed by the plaintiff seeking relief of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing the trade mark, selling counterfeits, and passing off along with other ancillary reliefs. CASE SETUP IN THE PLAINT 2. Plaintiff [Johnson and Johnson], a company organised and existing under the laws of New Jersey, United States of America, is engaged in manufacturing consumer healthcare products, medical devices and pharmaceutical products. It is stated that the plaintiff has more than two hundred thirty (230) subsidiaries and employs more than one lakh thirty 3. Plaintiff’s business is diversified into three segments, namely, consumer healthcare products, pharmaceuticals, and medical devices. In 1949, the