Delhi High Court · 2025-03-20
JAYA DEVI vs BHUPESH KUMAR & ANR.
- Citation / case number
- CM(M)-524/2025 2025:DHC:1830
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- JAYA DEVI
- Respondent
- BHUPESH KUMAR & ANR.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 20th March, 2025 CM(M) 524/2025 & CM APPL. 16348-16349/2025 JAYA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suraj Yadav, Advocate. versus BHUPESH KUMAR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. This Court is conscious of the limited scope and ambit of appreciation, while dealing with an application filed under Section 47 CPC. 2. It is settled position of law that the Executing Court can allow objection under Section 47 CPC only if it is found that the decree is void ab initio or nullity or if it is not capable of execution under the law. 3. Reference in this regard be made to one recent judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Pradeep Mehra vs. Harijivan J. Jethwa (Since deceased Thr. LRs) & Ors, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1395. Para 10, 11 and 12 of said judgment read as under:- “10. A bare perusal of the aforesaid provision shows that all questions between the parties can be decided by the executing court. But the important aspect to remember is that these questions are limited to the “execution of the decree”. The executing court can never go behind the decree. Under Sectio