INPRAPRASTHA COLLEGE OF WOMEN vs MS HIMANI MALHOTRA & ANR.

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10th March, 2025 W.P.(C) 11093/2023 and CM APPL.43071/2023, 23639/2024, 38149/2024 and 55594/2024 INPRAPRASTHA COLLEGE OF WOMEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Gogna, Mr. Priy Singh, Mr. Nishant Sharma and Mr. Nipun Jain, Advocates. versus MS HIMANI MALHOTRA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anandh Venkataramani, Mr.J.Shivam Kumar, Mr. Rishit Vimadalal, Ms.Rini Mehra and Mr. Devvrat Singh, Advocates for Respondent No.1. Mr. Mohinder J.S. Rupal, Mr. Hardik Rupal and Ms. Aishwarya Malhotra, Advocates for Respondent No.2/Delhi University. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JUDGEMENT JYOTI SINGH, J. 1. This writ petition is preferred by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India laying a challenge to Report dated 22.06.2023 rendered by the Appeal Committee constituted by the Chancellor of the University of Delhi under Clause 9(1) of Ordinance XII of the University of Delhi Act, 1922 (‘1922 Act’) in matter of termination of services of Respondent No. 1 herein. 2. Factual matrix to the extent necessary and relevant and as emerging from the writ petition is that Petitioner is the Constituent Colle