HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS SHANGHAI LTD & ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 19th March, 2025 + W.P.(C) 3431/2025 & CM APPLs. 16124/2025, 16125/2025, 16126/2025 HUSKY INJECTION MOLDING SYSTEMS SHANGHAI LTD & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gopal Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vikram Naik and Mr. Pulkit Devpura, Advs. (M: 9636127923) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pragyan Pradip Sharma, Sr. Adv. and Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Mr. Nikhil Sharma & Mr. Rustam, Advs. for R-4 to 8. (M: 9560872227) Ms. Shiva Lakshmi CGSC, with Mr. Govind Sharma, Mr. Madhav Bajaj & Mr. Neel Nikhar, Advs. (M: 8708500030) CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral) 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. 2. This is the second round of challenge by the Petitioners in the present case in respect of proceedings for imposition of Anti Dumping Duty before the designated authority being Directorate General of Trade Remedies (‘DGTR’). 3. The brief background of this case is that Respondent No.2, the Designated Authority, Directorate General of Trade Remedies, vide initiation Notification No.6/09/2024-DHTR dated 29th March, 2024 commenced an Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAHUL W.P.(C) 3431/2025 Page 1 of 11 Signing Date:19.03.2025 23:29:25 anti dumping investigation into imports of Plastic Processing Machines originating in or exported from China and Taiwan. The investigation had been commenced at the behest of the domestic industries being Respondent Nos. 4 to 8 in the present petition. The questionnaire responses were sought by the designated authority in response to the notice issued, calling upon interested parties. Petitioners were required to file their responses being such interested parties. 4. In the first round of challenge, there