Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-19

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Citation / case number
FAO(OS)-45/2020 2025:DHC:1852-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED
Respondent
RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 45/2020 and CM APPLs.21302/2020, 21305/2020 HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shaurya Pandey, Adv. versus RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LTD ...Respondent Through: Ms. Aastha Kakkar, Adv. SI Bharti, PS Jaffarpur Kalan CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R (ORAL) % 19.03.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. Learned Counsel for the parties submit ad idem that the appellant and the respondent have settled the dispute and that CS (OS) 237/2018, from an interlocutory order passed in which the present appeal emanates, has been decreed in terms of the settlement, by order dated 20 December 2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court, a copy of which has been handed over across the Bar. 2. It is taken on record. 3. The appeal, therefore, does not survive for further consideration and is accordingly disposed of. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. MARCH 19, 2025/dsn Signature Not Verified Click here to check corrigendum, if any Digitally Signed By:AJIT FAO(OS) 45/2020 Page 1 of 1 KUMAR Signing Date:25.03.2025 16:29:49

HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED vs RECKITT BENCKISER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED · Niyam