Bombay High Court · 2025-03-11
HARESH GAGLANI vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH COMMISSIONER OF MCGM
- Citation / case number
- WP/1335/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- HARESH GAGLANI
- Respondent
- MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI THROUGH COMMISSIONER OF MCGM
Judgment text excerpt
NISHA 1. Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Through Commissioner of MCGM) Off At: Annex Building, Municipal Head Office, 6th floor, Mahapalika Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001 2. Assistant Commissioner F/N Ward (MCGM) Off At: F/N Ward, Plot No. 96, Bhau Daji Marg, King Circle, Matunga (E), Mumbai – 400 019 3. Deleted 4. Deleted 5. State of Maharashtra (Through Government Pleader) ...Respondents Mr. Darshit Jain a/w Mr. Tejas Vihar Padwal for the Petitioner Mr. Drupad Patil a/w Ms. Anuja Tirmali i/b Ms. Komal Punjabi for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 – M.C.G.M. Mr. Milind More, Addl. G.P. for the Respondent-State. N. S. Chitnis 1/13 909-wpl.7325.2024.doc CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ. DATE : 11th MARCH 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per Revati Mohite Dere, J.) : 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to amend to delete the respondent Nos.3 and 4 from the array of respondents. Leave granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith with the consent of the parties and is taken up for final disposal. Mr. Patil waives notice on behalf of respondent Nos.1 and 2. Learned A