Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-10

GAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-3018/2025 2025:DHC:1589-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
GAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS.
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~43 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 10.03.2025 + W.P.(C) 3018/2025 GAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.Ankur Chhibber and Ms.Muskaan Dutta, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Avtaar Singh Deol, SPC with Ms.Mamta Tiwari, GP for UOI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 14266/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3018/2025 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners, praying for the following reliefs: - “i. Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing of the letter dated 27.01.2025(Annexure-P1) issued by the Respondents wherein representations dated 23.10.2024 (Annexure- P10) and 29.12.2024 (Annexure-P11) of the Petitioners have denied the benefit of Non- functional Upgradation in the grade pay of Rs.5400/- in an arbitrary and unfair manner; and ii. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 3018/2025 Page 1 of 3 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:17.03.2025 16:10:32 Respondents to grant the benefit of Non- functional Upgradation in the Grade Pay Rs.5400/- in Pay Band-3 w.e.f. the date of them being eligible as granted by this Hon'ble Court vide judgment(s) dated 09.09.2024 in W.P.(C) No.690/2022 (Annexure-P8), 14.10.2024 in W.P.(C) No.886/2020 (Annexure-P9) and Judgment dated 06.09.2010 in W.P.(C) No. 13225/2010 (Annexure-P3) passed by the Hon’ble High Court of Madras as upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No.8883/2011 vide order dated 10.10.2017 (Annextlre-P4) along with arrears, and all other consequential benefits; and” 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is squarely covered by the Judgment of thi

GAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS. vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS · Niyam