Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-18

DR RAJNIKANT VERMA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-3300/2025 2025:DHC:1893-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DR RAJNIKANT VERMA
Respondent
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER

Judgment text excerpt

$~113&117 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.03.2025 (113)+ W.P.(C) 3300/2025 DR RAJNIKANT VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Bhadoria, Mr. Umesh Singh, Mr. Karishma, Mr. Ashok Nagar and Mr. Mudit Aggarwal, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Akhil Mittal, Standing Counsel for MCD with Mr. Pritish Sabharwal, Adv. (117)+ W.P.(C) 3316/2025 DR RAJESHWARI JOSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Bhadoria, Mr. Umesh Singh, Mr. Karishma, Mr. Ashok Nagar and Mr. Mudit Aggarwal, Advs. versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anand Prakash Standing Counsel for MCD with Ms. Varsha Arya and Mr. Satbeer Prajapati, Advs. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:25.03.2025 W.P.(C) 3300/2025 & W.P.(C) 3316/2025 Page 1 of 5 20:00:54 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPLs. 15578-79/2025(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3300/2025 CM APPL. 15635-36/2025(Exemption) in W.P.(C) 3316/2025 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3300/2025 & CM APPL. 15577/2025 W.P.(C) 3316/2025 & CM APPL. 15634/2025. 2. These petitions have been filed, challenging the Order dated 17.05.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal (PB), New Delhi (‘learned Tribunal’) in OA No. 2146/2023 titled, ‘Dr. Rajni Kant Verma vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi’ and in OA No. 2145/2023 titled, ‘Dr. Rajeshwari Joshi vs. Commissioner, Municipal Corporation of Delhi’, limited to a challenge that the learned Tribunal has erred in not directing payment of interest to the petitioner herein, from the date when the retiral benefits became due to the petitioner. 3.

DR RAJNIKANT VERMA vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER · Niyam