Bombay High Court · 2025-03-17
DNH Spinners Private Limited 2012 13 vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(2)
- Citation / case number
- WP/2279/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- DNH Spinners Private Limited 2012 13
- Respondent
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Central Circle 1(2)
Judgment text excerpt
2025:BHC-OS:4256 1 31-39,41,42.WP.4898.25 and ors(J).docx Revati IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4894 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4895 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4903 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4909 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4912 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4916 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4917 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4933 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.4953 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.5015 OF 2025 WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO.5041 OF 2025 DNH Spinners Private Limited a company incorporated in India having its registered office at Unit No.1701, 17th floor, Supreme Headquarters, Junction of 14th and 33rd Road, Bandra West, Mumbai-400050. .. Petitioner Versus 1. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Circle -1(2), 906, Pratiksha Bhavan, Old CGO Annexe, Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai-400020. 2. Principal Commissioner of Income-tax Central -1 Mumbai 2 31-39,41,42.WP.4898.25 and ors(J).docx Pratiksha Bhavan, Old CGO Annexe, Maharishi Karve Road, Mumbai-400020. 3. Union of India, Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, North Block, New Delhi-110001. .. Respondents ______________________________________________________ Mr. Dharan Gandhi for the Petitioner. Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma a/w Ms Shraddha Worlikar for the respondents. ______________________________________________________ CORAM M.S. Sonak & Jitendra Jain, JJ. RESERVED ON: 10 March 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: 17 March 2025 JUDGMENT (Per Jitendra Jain, J):- 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The rule is made returnable immediately at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. This is group of 11 writ petitions f