Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-03-20

CRP/641/2025 of KEESARI @ KESARI SATHYAMMA @ SATHAMMA Vs KOWKUTLA SARADA @ KOWKUTLA SHARADA

Citation / case number
APHC010111882025
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
CRP/641/2025 of KEESARI @ KESARI SATHYAMMA @ SATHAMMA
Respondent
KOWKUTLA SARADA @ KOWKUTLA SHARADA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

APHC010111882025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3209] (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 641 OF 2025 Between: Keesari @ Kesari Sathyamma @ Sathamma ...PETITIONER AND Kowkutla Sarada Kowkutla Sharada and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. Mrs.T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): -- The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2) Since the grievance of the petitioner is that returning of the plaint despite complying with the objections, notice to the respondent-defendant is not necessary. 3) The petitioner filed a suit vide O.S.No.___ of 2025 (Unnumbered), on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge, Narasaraopet, seeking declaration that the plaintiff is the absolute owner of the suit schedule property and for the consequential permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule properties. At the time of scrutiny, as seen from the material placed before this Court, it would app