Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-03-27

CRP/2545/2014 of Vallur Changamma Vs Peda Palem Mari Muthu

Citation / case number
APHC010689242014
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
CRP/2545/2014 of Vallur Changamma
Respondent
Peda Palem Mari Muthu
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 APHC010689242014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3365] AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2545/2014 Between: Vallur Changamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Peda Palem Mari Muthu ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S SUDARSHAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. V SUDHAKAR REDDY 2 THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V R K KRUPA SAGAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2545/2014 The Court made the following Order: Heard learned counsel on both sides. 02 Perused the material available on record. 03. O.S.No.78 of 2009 before learned Senior Civil Judge, Sullurpet was filed with a prayer for mandatory injunction as well as perpetual injunction. There were two defendants. Despite service of notice they did not choose to appear and contest, therefore, the learned trial Court proceeded ex-parte. Over a period of time, the decree was put to execution in the E.P.No.50 of 2010. It was duly executed. It was around that time, the defendant took measures to see that the ex-parte decree was set aside and in that process there occurs 743 days d