Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-03-19

CRLRC/831/2010 of GARIMELLA PAVAN ABHISHEK, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DIST. Vs SUBRAHMANYA SRINIVASA RAO, CHENNAI, & ANR.

Citation / case number
APHC010175052010
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
CRLRC/831/2010 of GARIMELLA PAVAN ABHISHEK, SRIKAKULAM TOWN & DIST.
Respondent
SUBRAHMANYA SRINIVASA RAO, CHENNAI, & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

1 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.831 of 2010 Dated 20.03.2025 APHC010175052010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 831/2010 Between: Garimella Pavan Abhishek, Srikakulam Town & Dist. ...PETITIONER AND Subrahmanya Srinivasa Rao Chennai and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Aravala Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondent(S): Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER: A report from the District Legal Services Authority, Srikakulam, is received. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions from the petitioner. The petitioner was a minor in 2010 when the revision case was filed. Now, he has become a major. Therefore, the revision 2 Dr.YLR, J Crl.R.C.No.831 of 2010 Dated 20.03.2025 case is liable to be dismissed as infructuous. For arrears, the petitioner may work out his legal remedies as per law. 3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications,