CRLRC/2165/2010 of KUMMARIPALLE CHINNA SIDDAIAH, KURNOOL DISTRICT AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF A.P.,REP.BY P.P.,HIGH COURT, HYD AND 4 OTHERS

APHC010665172010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2165/2010 Between: Kummaripalle Chinna Siddaiah ...PETITIONER(S) and another AND The State of A.P and others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V NITESH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. KARRI MURALI KRISHNA The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.2165 of 2010 ORDER: Heard Mr.Ch.Karthik, learned counsel representing Mr.V.Nitesh, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. It is represented that the matter has become infructuous inasmuch as the order passed by the Executive Magistrate invoking the power under Section 145 of Cr.P.C. is only for six months and in respect of the same, a civil suit was instituted and dismissed and an appeal was preferred and the same was also dismissed. 3. In view of the above, it is fairly represented by Mr.Ch.Karthik, that the revision has become infructuous. 4. Learned counsel for the unofficial respondents also reitera