COM I RAVI BHASKER S NO 250944 B vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~45 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 11.03.2025 + W.P.(C) 3044/2025 COM I RAVI BHASKER S NO 250944 B .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Arvind Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.K. D. Sharma, SPC with Mr.Shriram Tiwary, GP and Mr.Aditya Goyal, Adv. for UOI Comdr. Vikrant Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 14449/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 3044/2025 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 13.11.2024 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “learned Tribunal”) in Original Application No.2021/2022 (O.A.) titled COM (I) Ravi Bhasker v. Union of India & Ors., whereby the said O. A. filed by the petitioner herein was dismissed. 3. The petitioner further challenges the ‘Standards for Assessment by USG for Cadets including Women Candidates’ dated 11.11.2009. The petitioner also challenges the Reports dated 29.07.2020 and Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 3044/2025 Page 1 of 8 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:19.03.2025 19:38:50 11.09.2020, issued by the Medical Board and the Appeal Medical Board respectively, declaring the petitioner ‘unfit’ for being commissioned into the Indian Navy via CW entry. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner joined the Indian Navy on 30.02.2018 and, having undergone and cleared all prerequisite training and tests, was assigned the Trade COM TEL II. While being in service, the petitioner applied for commissioning in the Indian Navy through CW/ACC on 16.10.2019 under the Commission Worthy Scheme 2020 (in short, ‘CW’), after having been declared medically