C SHARMA vs NAVDEEP SINGH & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~J- * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 06th March 2025 CRL.M.C. 1624/2013 C SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in-person. versus NAVDEEP SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State. Mr. Nishant Gautam, CGSC for R-5 &7 HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J U D G M E N T ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J. By way of the present petition filed under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner impugns order dated 18.10.2012, whereby the learned Sessions Court was pleased to dismiss the criminal revision petition bearing CR No.483/12 filed by the petitioner challenging order dated 20.09.2012 made by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate in CC No.15/1. 2. By way of order dated 20.09.2012, the learned Magistrate had dismissed the complaint under section 203 of the Cr.P.C., declining to issue summons to the persons arrayed as accused in the said case. Signature Not Verified Signed By:ANJALI KAUSHIK Signing Date:06.03.2025 14:36:13 CRL.M.C. 1624/2013 Page 1 of 8 3. It may be clarified, that in her application filed before the learned Magistrate under section 200 of the Cr.P.C., the petitioner had arrayed the following persons as the proposed accused : (1) Yes Associates; (2) Subhash Midha; and (3) Sanjay Duggal. 4. In the revision petition filed before the learned Sessions Court, the petitioner added another respondent namely Navdeep Singh, Advocate. 5. In the present proceedings, the petitioner has omitted Yes Associates as a party but has added the following persons as respondents in the matter : (1) Shri Mukesh Tokas; (2) Home Secretary, Ministry of Home, North Block, N Delhi; (3) S.H.O. Police Thana Sector 16B, Dwarka North, Se