Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-26

BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION vs DIVI AUTOMOTIVE AND PETROCHEM INDIA & ANR.

Citation / case number
CS(COMM)-485/2023 2025:DHC:2019
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION
Respondent
DIVI AUTOMOTIVE AND PETROCHEM INDIA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(COMM) 485/2023 & I.A. 13215/2023, I.A. 13216/2023 BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Pravin Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Sampurnaa Sanyal, Ms. Nimrat Singh, Advocates (M: 9870201041) versus DIVI AUTOMOTIVE AND PETROCHEM INDIA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Abhishek Dev, Advocate (M: 8802121996) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA ORDER % 12.03.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J (ORAL) 1. The present suit has been filed for permanent injunction restraining the defendants from infringing upon the plaintiff’s registered marks, i.e., , and . 2. It is the case of the plaintiff that the defendants are engaged in the business of manufacturing and supplying of lubricant oil products, like engine oil, gear oil, etc. 3. Plaintiff contends that the defendants were found to be using the impugned marks on their products, i.e., lubricant oils, such as engine oil, gear oil, etc., with the following marks: 4. The plaintiff alleges that the defendants have blatantly copied the letter ‘B’, as registered in favour of the plaintiff. Table of comparison between the marks of the plaintiff and defendants, is reproduced as under: 5. Thus, it is the