Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

march 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-03-28

BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA vs GOVT.NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-2888/2025 2025:DHC:2106
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA
Respondent
GOVT.NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~J * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: 28.03.2025 W.P.(C) 2888/2025 BHARAT BHUSHAN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhil Srivastava and Ms. Muskan Sharma, Advocates alongwith petitioner in person. versus GOVT.NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Harshita Nathrani, Adv. for R1 and R2. Mr. Samar Singh Kachwaha, Mr. Harshvardhan Thakur and Mr. Yash D., Advocates for R3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA JUDGMENT CM APPL. 13748/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2888/2025 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, seeking directions for the respondents to take necessary steps to ensure compliance with the directions issued by the Supreme Court of India and this Court regarding live streaming and video recording of court proceedings. 4. It is submitted that the Supreme Court in Swapnil Tripathi vs. Supreme Court of India (W.P. (C) No. 1232 of 2018, AIR 2018 SC 4806) 5. Following this, the e-committee of the Supreme Court formulated Model Rules for Live Streaming and Recording of Court Proceedings, stating that greater transparency and accessibility to justic