BANK OF BARODA vs GURDEV SINGH MINHAS & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~121 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.03.2025 + W.P.(C) 3594/2025 BANK OF BARODA .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun Aggarwal, Adv. versus GURDEV SINGH MINHAS & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rishabh Sahu, Sr. Panel counsel with Mr.Sameer Sharma & Ms.Somya Dhawan, Advs. for R-2 to R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RENU BHATNAGAR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 16819/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 16817/2025 2. This application has been filed by the petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 7 months and 26 days in filing of the petition. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned. 4. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 3594/2025 & CM APPL. 16818/2025 5. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 16.04.2024 passed by the learned Central Administrative Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 3594/2025 Page 1 of 6 By:RENUKA NEGI Signing Date:29.03.2025 13:26:01 Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘learned Tribunal’), in Original Application No. 1990/2018 (O.A.) titled Gurdev Singh Minhas v. Union of India & Ors., partially allowing the O.A. filed by the respondent no.1 herein, with the following directions:- “12. Perusing the pleadings available on record and the arguments advanced by the learned counsels for the respective sides and taking lead from the various ratios laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court and followed by this Tribunal, I am of the considered opinion that if any erroneous payment has been made to the applicant and the fault for making such payment entirely lies with the respondents and if any wrong fixation has been done which has resulted into excess pa