BALE RAM KASHYAP vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RSA 167/2019 BALE RAM KASHYAP .....Appellant Through: Mr. Jogy Scaria, Mrs. Beena Victor, Mr. Keerthipriyan E., Ms. M. Priya, Mr. Ashwani Kumar Soni, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr. Sarvan Kumar, Adv. for R- 1/UOI. Mr. Pankaj Seth, Adv. for R-2 and 3. % Date of Decision: 12.03.2025. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. The present Regular Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 CPC seeking the setting aside of the impugned judgment/order dated 10.05.2019, passed by the learned ADJ, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in RCA No. 32/2017, whereby the appeal filed against the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2017, passed by the learned SCJ-Cum-RC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Suit No. 25/03, was dismissed. The learned First Appellate Court partly allowed the appeal and, in addition to the arrears of salary already decreed in favor of the RSA 167/2019 Page 1 of 5 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DAMINI YADAV Signing Date:19.03.2025 13:21:21 appellant by the learned Trial Court, held the appellant entitled to the recovery of a sum of Rs. 1651/-. The appellant was also awarded pendent lite and future interest at the rate of 10% p.a. on the said sum. Aggrieved by these findings of the learned Trial Court, the appellant has filed the present Regular Second Appeal. 2. In the appeal the appellant has raised the following question of law: “A) Whether the courts below were justified in rejecting the rightful claim of the appellant when there were sufficient evidences, document and statement of the witnesses supporting the claim of the appellant?” 3. Learned counsel for the appellant, during the