ASHOK KUMAR vs HARISH KUMAR

Judgment text excerpt

$~59 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 07.03.2025 + RC.REV. 49/2025 ASHOK KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. M.S. Sisodia, Mr. Sachin Shukla, Mr. Nikhil Gupta, Mr. Ajay Sharma and Ms. Gurpreet Kaur, Advocates with Petitioner in person. versus HARISH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Kaushik, Advocate with Respondent in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The Petitioner and the Respondent are present in the Court today. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions from the Petitioner, submits that the Petitioner needs additional time upto 01.03.2026 to vacate the tenanted premises. 3. Learned Counsel for the Respondent, on instructions from the Respondents, submits that the Respondent is agreeable to allow time up to 30.09.2025, subject to the Petitioner paying user and occupation charges in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- per month, till the vacation of the subject premises to the Respondent. 4. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this is Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RC.REV. 49/2025 Page 1 of 4 By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:08.03.2025 18:42:14 acceptable to the Petitioner. 5. In view thereof, let an Undertaking by way of an Affidavit be filed by the Petitioner, within a period of one week undertaking that: (i) The Petitioner shall hand over the vacant physical possession of the premises i.e., one shop on the eastern side at 2nd number in property bearing No.X/1100 admeasuring 8.6 x 13 ft. equal to 10.25 sq. yards situated in the abadi of New Chand Mohalla Raj Garh Colony, Gandhi Nagar, Delhi- 110031 as shown in red colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]; (ii) The vacant, physica