AS/930/2010 of R.SUNKANNA Vs THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND 3 OTHERS

APHC010668462010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3368] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT NO: 930/2010 Between: 1. R.SUNKANNA, S/O. R.SUNKANNA BUSINESS D.NO. 18/775/4 TILAK NAGAR, GUNTAKAL ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER AND 3 OTHERS, A.P.TRANSCO, ANANTAPUR 2. THE DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.TRANSCO, GOOTY, ANANTAPUR 3. THE ASSISTANT DIVISIONAL ENGINEER OPERATION, A.P.TRANSCO, GUINTAKAL, ANANTAPUR 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, A.P.TRANSCO, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Appellant: 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI APPEAL SUIT No.930 OF 2010 J U D G M E N T: Ms.G.Anusha, learned counsel representing for the appellant would submit that no instructions are received from the legal representatives of the appellant to take steps to implead legal representatives, since the appellant died, and earlier a memo was also filed reporting no instructions for the appellant. 2. In that view of the matter,