AS/851/2008 of Karumanchi Hari Krishna Prasad Vs Nidigonda Ramu

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.: A.S.No.851/2008 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. DATE ORDER OFFICE No. NOTE 9 02.03.2026 RNT, J&BM, J I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 On 02.02.2026, the following order was passed: “ I.A.Nos.1 & 2 of 2025 Sri B.Parameswarao, learned counsel for the appellant who filed memo of proof of service submits that respondent Nos.7 & 8 could not be served. As per the postal endorsement it is mentioned as “insufficient address”. He prays for time to take fresh steps. 2. Issue fresh notice to respondent Nos.7 & 8 to correct address. 3. In addition to the normal mode of service, the appellant is permitted to take out personal notice to respondent Nos.7 & 8 to correct address by registered post and acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry before the next date of listing. 4. Learned counsel for the appellant shall furnish the correct and clear address in the Registry as well. 5. Post after four (04) weeks” 2. Office has submitted the following report: “R7 & R8 - Notices sent not yet returned. My lord, Learned counsel not filed any correct/clear address for R7 & R8 before Registry. Hence notices sent to previous addresses. 2 As per memo proof