ANUJ AHUJA vs SUMITRA MITTAL

Judgment text excerpt

* I N T H E H I G H CO U RT O F DE L H I AT NE W DE L H I Reserved on: March 11, 2025 % Pronounced on: March 17, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 1327/2025 & CRL.M.A. 5884/2025-Stay ANUJ AHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Ms. Ananya Sikri, Ms. Medhavi Bhatia, Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh, Mr. Dushyant K. Kaul and Ms. Rupam Jha, Advocates Versus SUMITRA MITTAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. F. K. Jha and Mr. Gaurav Jha, Advocates + CRL.M.C. 1341/2025 & CRL.M.A. 5921/2025-Stay ANUJ AHUJA .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Amit George, Ms. Ananya Sikri, Ms. Medhavi Bhatia, Ms. Ibansara Syiemlieh, Mr. Dushyant K. Kaul and Ms. Rupam Jha, Advocates Versus RAJESH MITTAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. F. K. Jha and Mr. Gaurav Jha, Advocates CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE JUDGMENT 1. By way of the present petitions under Section 528 of the Bhartiya CRL.M.C. 1327/2025 and CRL.M.C. 1341/2025 Page 1 of 16 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:BABLOO SHAH Signing Date:17.03.2025 15:14:09 Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (Section 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973), the petitioner, Anuj Ahuja, seeks quashing of two impugned order(s) both dated 27.01.2025 passed in C.A. No.138/2024 and C.A. No.139/2024 entitled “Anuj Ahuja vs. Rajesh Mittal”1 by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi 2. Vide the two impugned order(s), the learned ASJ dismissed the application(s) of the petitioner seeking waiver of deposit of 20% of the compensation amount to suspend both the orders of sentence both dated 08.07.2024 in Ct. Cas. No.2196/2020 and Ct. Cas. No.2197/2020 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Rohini Courts, Delhi 3, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 4. 2. Pithily put, the disputes inter se petitioner and respondent(s) emanate from two