ANEETA LEEKHA vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27th March, 2025 FAO 75/2025 & CM APPL. 18015/2025 ANEETA LEEKHA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Raman Gandhi, Adv. versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA DHARMESH SHARMA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 18016/2025- (EXMP). 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application is disposed of. FAO 75/2025 & CM APPL. 18015/2025 3. The appellant is preferring this appeal under Order XLIII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [“CPC”], thereby assailing the impugned order dated 28.02.2025 whereby the learned District Judge- 02 & Wakf Tribunal, New Delhi District, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi [“learned DJ”] has held that the dispute raised by the appellant is of a commercial nature and covered by Section 2(1)(c)(vii) read with Rule 2(1)(c)(xxii) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [“CC Act”]. 4. No one is present for the respondent despite sending advance notice. 5. Having heard the learned counsel for the appellant, this Court has no hesitation in finding that the present appeal is bereft of any merits. 6. In a nutshell, the appellant/plaintiff filed a suit seeking rec